Settlement agreements and redundancy
The redundancy payment is arithmetic and is not negotiable. The settlement agreement is buying the claim that a redundancy can generate — principally unfair dismissal. Confusing the two is how people accept an offer that is mostly their own statutory entitlement handed back to them.
Key points
- “Redundancy” is a statutory definition in s.139(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, not a description of a management decision.
- Statutory redundancy pay, statutory notice and accrued holiday are owed whether or not you sign anything. Work them out before you read the offer.
- What the agreement actually buys is the unfair dismissal claim. In April to June 2026 the tribunal received 5,822 unfair dismissal complaints and 632 about redundancy pay — about 9.2 to one.
- A redundancy that is not genuine is still a dismissal. It is just an unfair one.
- Statutory redundancy pay sits in the half of the payment that can use the £30,000 threshold. Notice pay never does.
If the offer has been described to you as a “severance package”, note that the word has no meaning in UK law — it is usually statutory redundancy pay plus notice plus some compensation, bundled into one figure.
A redundancy is a definition, not a decision
The most useful thing to know about redundancy is that the word has a statutory meaning, and it is narrower than the way employers use it.
For the purposes of this Act an employee who is dismissed shall be taken to be dismissed by reason of redundancy if the dismissal is wholly or mainly attributable to— (a) the fact that his employer has ceased or intends to cease— (i) to carry on the business for the purposes of which the employee was employed by him, or (ii) to carry on that business in the place where the employee was so employed, or (b) the fact that the requirements of that business— (i) for employees to carry out work of a particular kind, or (ii) for employees to carry out work of a particular kind in the place where the employee was employed by the employer, have ceased or diminished or are expected to cease or diminish.Read the section on legislation.gov.uk
Read what that requires. The dismissal has to be wholly or mainly attributable to one of three things: the employer stopping the business, stopping it in the place where you worked, or the requirements of the business for employees to do work of a particular kind having ceased or diminished.
A great many dismissals described as redundancies do not fit. If the work is still there and someone else is doing it, the requirement for employees to do work of that kind has not diminished. If the role is renamed and re-advertised, the same problem arises. If a team of six becomes a team of five and you were selected, that probably is a redundancy — but the selection has to have been fair, which is a separate question.
None of that makes a settlement offer a bad one. It changes what you are being asked to give up.
What you are owed before anybody negotiates anything
Three amounts are fixed by statute or by your contract and are due whether you sign an agreement or not. Establish them first, because they are the baseline every other number should be measured against.
- Statutory redundancy pay, if the dismissal is a redundancy and you have at least 2 years’ service. Age-weighted, capped at £751 a week for 2026/27, service counted to a maximum of 20 years, overall maximum £22,530.
- Notice, under s.86(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or your contract if it gives more — one week per complete year to a ceiling of twelve.
- Accrued untaken holiday, to the termination date.
The calculator works all three out exactly and separates them from the part that is actually being negotiated.
Add up those three figures. Subtract them from the offer. What is left is the compensation, and that is the entire negotiation. An offer of “£18,000 redundancy package” where £16,000 of it is statutory redundancy pay and notice you were owed anyway is a £2,000 offer.
What the agreement is really buying
Here is where the caseload data is more useful than any amount of explanation. These are the complaints the employment tribunal received in April to June 2026, alongside how many it disposed of and how many were still open at the end of the quarter.
| Complaint | Received | Disposed of | Open at quarter end |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | 5,822 | 2,782 | 22,336 |
| Unauthorised deductions from wages | 3,165 | 1,515 | 11,600 |
| Breach of contract | 2,017 | 1,187 | 8,852 |
| Redundancy pay | 632 | 295 | 2,671 |
| Redundancy — failure to inform and consult | 94 | 17 | 293 |
HMCTS management information for April to June 2026, covering cases on the Reform case management system and single claims only. It is not official statistics and the figures are provisional. Source: Tribunals statistics quarterly: April to June 2026, published 10 September 2026.
Redundancy pay is one of the smallest categories in the table. Unfair dismissal is the largest by a distance. That is not because redundancy is rare — it is because the redundancy calculation is arithmetic, and arithmetic does not produce a tribunal claim. What produces a claim is the argument that the redundancy was not genuine, or that the selection or consultation was not fair, and that argument is an unfair dismissal claim.
So when an employer offers a settlement in a redundancy, the thing they are buying is almost never the redundancy payment. It is the possibility that you say the redundancy was a dressed-up dismissal. The size of the offer should be a function of how likely that argument is to succeed and what it would cost them to defend — which is exactly what the negotiation is about.
Consultation, and why you rarely see a claim about it
There are two consultation duties and they behave very differently.
Individual consultation is part of what makes a redundancy dismissal fair. Skip it and the dismissal is likely unfair, which shows up as an unfair dismissal claim rather than as a consultation claim.
Collective consultation applies where enough employees are affected, and has its own remedy. Notice how rarely it appears on its own: only 94 complaints in the quarter, against 5,822 for unfair dismissal. It is real and it is usually argued as part of something larger.
The practical point for you is narrow. If you were told about the redundancy and dismissed in the same conversation, that is worth putting in front of a solicitor before you sign anything, because it goes directly to the claim the agreement is asking you to waive.
Been offered a settlement in a redundancy?
Send your postcode and the deadline. Your employer usually pays for the advice, and a sign-off is an appointment rather than a project.
If the “redundancy” does not meet the s.139 definition, what you may have instead is an ordinary dismissal — or, if you were pushed into resigning, a constructive dismissal, which works differently and is worth understanding before you hand in anything.
Voluntary redundancy is still a dismissal
Volunteering does not make it a resignation. You are still dismissed, the statutory payment is still due if you qualify, and the agreement still has to meet all six conditions in s.203(3) to be worth anything to the employer.
What volunteering does do is weaken the unfair dismissal argument, because it is hard to say you were unfairly selected for something you asked for. Since that argument is what the ex gratia element is priced against, voluntary schemes usually carry a smaller one — and a fixed, published formula that is the same for everyone who volunteers.
That is a reasonable trade rather than a trick. It is worth understanding before you decide, because it is one of the few moments in this process where you choose which claim you are giving up.
Enhanced schemes: yours already, or part of the offer?
Many employers have a redundancy scheme that pays more than the statute. The question to ask before you value an offer is whether that enhancement is contractual or discretionary.
If it is contractual — written into your contract, or established by custom and practice — you are entitled to it regardless, and an offer that presents it as compensation is presenting your own money as a concession. If it is genuinely discretionary, it is part of the negotiation.
It is a two-sentence question and firms that do this work will answer it from the documents in minutes. What that advice costs, and who pays for it.
Where the tax line falls in a redundancy
The same diagram as a table
| Part | What it covers | Amount | Tax treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 — contractual | Notice pay, holiday pay, unpaid wages, bonus or commission | £7,800 | Income tax and National Insurance in full |
| Part 2 — ex gratia | Statutory redundancy pay, compensation for loss of employment, injury to feelings | £22,000 | First £30,000 free of tax and National Insurance |
| Total | — | £29,800 | — |
Threshold figure: Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, s.403(1). Illustrative amounts.
Statutory redundancy pay and any ex gratia compensation sit in Part 2 and count towards the £30,000 threshold. Notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages sit in Part 1 and are taxed as earnings in full.
The trap is the same one as everywhere else on this site: relabelling notice pay as compensation does not move it across the line, because the post-employment notice pay rules calculate the notice element arithmetically from your contract and your dates. How that calculation works and why the labels do not decide it.
One redundancy-specific point. Because statutory redundancy pay counts towards the threshold rather than sitting outside it, a long-service worker can find a meaningful part of the £30,000 already used up by the statutory payment before any compensation is added. That is worth modelling before agreeing a headline figure.
Common questions
Can I be made redundant and given a settlement agreement?
Yes, and it is one of the commonest reasons an agreement appears. The redundancy payment itself is fixed by statute and is not really negotiable. What the agreement buys is your waiver of the claims that a redundancy can generate — principally unfair dismissal, if you say the redundancy was not genuine or the process was not fair.
Is a settlement agreement better than a redundancy payment?
They are not alternatives. A settlement agreement usually contains the statutory redundancy payment and then adds an ex gratia sum on top, in exchange for the waiver. If an agreement offers you less than your statutory entitlement, that is not a settlement, it is a discount — check the statutory figure first.
What actually counts as a redundancy?
Section 139(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 defines it, and the definition is narrower than everyday use. The dismissal has to be wholly or mainly attributable to the employer ceasing the business, ceasing it in that place, or to the requirements for employees to do work of a particular kind having ceased or diminished. A reorganisation that replaces you with someone doing the same job is not a redundancy just because it is called one.
Do I have to be consulted?
Yes, and there are two separate duties: individual consultation, which is part of what makes a redundancy dismissal fair, and collective consultation duties where enough people are affected. The tribunal caseload shows very few standalone claims about the collective duty — 94 in the last quarter — which tells you it is usually argued as part of an unfair dismissal claim rather than on its own.
Does voluntary redundancy change anything?
Less than people expect. Volunteering affects how the selection happened, not whether you were dismissed — you still are, and the statutory redundancy payment is still due if you qualify. What it does weaken is the unfair dismissal argument, which is precisely the claim the settlement is buying, so a voluntary scheme usually comes with a smaller ex gratia element.
My employer has an enhanced redundancy scheme. Is that the same as an ex gratia payment?
No, and the difference matters for tax and for negotiation. If an enhanced scheme is contractual you are entitled to it anyway, so offering it as though it were compensation is offering you your own money. Ask whether the enhancement is contractual or discretionary before treating it as part of the settlement.
Is my statutory redundancy pay taxed?
Statutory redundancy pay counts towards the £30,000 threshold rather than being taxed as earnings. Notice pay does not — it is taxed in full whatever the agreement calls it, because of the post-employment notice pay rules.
How long do I have to claim a statutory redundancy payment?
6 months from the date the job ended, according to GOV.UK. That is a different and longer clock than the three months that applies to an unfair dismissal claim, and it is the shorter one that usually matters, because unfair dismissal is the claim with the value in it.
Sources cited on this page
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s.139 — the meaning of redundancy
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s.162 — amount of a redundancy payment
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s.86 — minimum notice
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s.203 — conditions for a valid settlement agreement
- GOV.UK — Redundancy pay
- Acas — Discussing and negotiating an offer
- MoJ / HMCTS — Tribunals statistics quarterly: April to June 2026
Every figure above was read from the source it is attributed to on 19 September 2026. How we check this.
Get your agreement checked
Six quick questions. Your details are the last step, never the first.
Your enquiry is ready to send
Here is what happens after you submit:
- Your answers go to solicitors’ firms that advertise for your area.
- No more than three of them may contact you, using the details you gave.
- You decide who, if anyone, you speak to. You are committed to nothing.
We are not a law firm. Sending this does not create a solicitor–client relationship.